Helpful tips

Why is Wikipedia not a reliable source to use in a research paper?

Why is Wikipedia not a reliable source to use in a research paper?

Wikipedia is not a reliable source because it allows multiple users to edit, and it is not safe to assume that the facts presented there have been checked before publishing them. Who writes the Wikipedia pages? Anyone is allowed to edit the content of any Wikipedia page.

What are the disadvantages of using Wikipedia?


  • Anyone can create, edit, or delete Wikipedia articles.
  • Wikipedia articles cannot be considered scholarly, because we know nothing about the contributors.
  • Articles are works-in-progress, meaning changes are constantly occuring to the information.

What are the issues with using Wikipedia?

There have been documented problems caused by open, anonymous gatherings of people on Wikipedia, such as the writing of vitriol (noted in 2003) or wiki-gangs (noted in July 2005). Another problem is that anyone can edit articles at any time, so people can vandalize articles, as long as they have an account.

Why does Wikipedia not allow original research?

This page in a nutshell: Wikipedia does not publish original thought. All material in Wikipedia must be attributable to a reliable, published source. Articles may not contain any new analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not clearly stated by the sources themselves.

Is Wikipedia a credible source for academic research?

Wikipedia – Academic Use Wikipedia is not considered a credible source. Wikipedia is increasingly used by people in the academic community, from students to professors, as an easily accessible tertiary source for information about anything and everything.Jum. I 29, 1441 AH

What are three disadvantages of using websites like blogs and wikis?


  • Anyone can edit so this may be too open for some applications, for example confidential documentation.
  • Open to SPAM and Vandalism if not managed properly.
  • Requires Internet connectivity to collaborate, but technologies to produce print versions of articles are improving.

What is a major criticism of Wikipedia that needs to be addressed?

Most criticism of Wikipedia has been directed towards its content, its community of established users, and its processes. Critics have questioned its factual reliability, the readability and organization of the articles, the lack of methodical fact-checking, and its political bias.

Why Wikipedia should be a valid source?

Wikipedia is ideal in these situations because it will allow you to find the information, as well as sources which you can research to confirm that information. In any case, you should not cite Wikipedia itself, but the source provided; you should certainly look up the source yourself before citing it.

Can Wikipedia be used as a research reference Why or why not?

The answer from Wikipedia is clear: at least in research projects, “you probably shouldn’t be citing Wikipedia”. Well, Wikipedia, like other encyclopedias and handbooks, is a tertiary source. Tertiary sources are those that take their information from other primary and secondary sources.Jum. II 7, 1440 AH

Is it good to use Wikipedia for research?

Wikipedia can be a great source of information, but there has been friction between it and academia due to its open source concept. In this guide, I am going to show you a little history of Wikipedia and its relationship with academia. In addition, I will show you how using Wikipedia can be beneficial and actually help you with your research.

Is it bad to cite Wikipedia in a research paper?

a bad idea to cite an encyclopedia in academic research papers. Wikipedia is increasingly used by people in the academic community, from first-year students to professors, as the easiest source of information about anything and everything. However, citation of Wikipedia in research papers may not be considered acceptable, because Wikipedia is not a

Why are there so many problems with Wikipedia?

Another problem with a lot of content on Wikipedia is that many contributors do not cite their sources—something that makes it hard for the reader to judge the credibility of what is written. As of 2010, this problem has almost certainly been diminishing over the last several years, but it has not gone away.

Why is Wikipedia not considered a reliable source?

Wikipedia can be a great tool for learning and researching information. However, as with all reference works, Wikipedia is not considered to be a reliable source as not everything in Wikipedia is accurate, comprehensive, or unbiased. Many of the general rules of thumb for conducting research apply to Wikipedia, including: