What does the legal term entail mean?

What does the legal term entail mean?

Entail, also called fee tail, in feudal English law, an interest in land bound up inalienably in the grantee and then forever to his direct descendants. A basic condition of entail was that if the grantee died without direct descendants the land reverted to the grantor.

What does the term entail?

1 : to impose, involve, or imply as a necessary accompaniment or result the project will entail considerable expense. 2 : to restrict (property) by limiting the inheritance to the owner’s lineal descendants or to a particular class thereof.

Why is entail important?

The purpose of an entail was to keep the land of a family intact in the main line of succession. The heir to an entailed estate could not sell the land, or bequeath it to anyone but his direct heir.

What is an entail interest?

An equitable interest in land under which ownership is limited to a person and the heirs of his body (either generally or those of a specified class). Such heirs are still those who would inherit under the law of intestacy as it applied before the Administration of Estates Act 1925.

When was entail abolished?

(Virginia abolished entail in 1776, but permitted primogeniture to persist until 1785.)

What does job entail mean?

To entail is to involve. A job at a movie theater might entail sweeping popcorn off the floor, probably because watching a movie entails eating popcorn in the dark. It’s a small price to pay! The word entail, which comes from Latin, is connected to the idea of preconditions. That’s what being responsible entails!

How does an entail work?

In English common law, fee tail or entail is a form of trust established by deed or settlement which restricts the sale or inheritance of an estate in real property and prevents the property from being sold, devised by will, or otherwise alienated by the tenant-in-possession, and instead causes it to pass automatically …

What does the right to freedom of thought mean?

The right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion (which includes the freedom to hold beliefs) in article 18.1 is far-reaching and profound; it encompasses freedom of thought on all matters, personal conviction and the commitment to religion or belief, whether manifested individually or in community with others.

How is the freedom of thought and conscience protected?

The Committee draws the attention of States parties to the fact that the freedom of thought and the freedom of conscience are protected equally with the freedom of religion and belief.

What does the Human Rights Committee say about freedom of thought?

The Human Rights Committee has made extensive comments in its General Comment No. 22: The right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion. Headings and notes have been added here to sections of this Comment for ease of reading.

How is the law tailored to suit Society?

This school of thought holds that the law is tailored so as to suit the interests of the most powerful members of society. In essence, the law should not be changed so as to prevent an outcome that would be in the best interest of members of the public.

What are natural rights and what are legal rights?

Natural rights and legal rights are two types of rights. Natural rights are those that are not dependent on the laws or customs of any particular culture or government, and so are universal and inalienable (they cannot be repealed by human laws, though one can forfeit their enforcement through one’s actions,…

Where does the word entail come from in law?

Entail, also called fee tail, in feudal English law, an interest in land bound up inalienably in the grantee and then forever to his direct descendants.

How are legal rights related to moral rights?

Legal Rights. Legal rights are, clearly, rights which exist under the rules of legal systems or by virtue of decisions of suitably authoritative bodies within them. They raise a number of different philosophical issues. (1) Whether legal rights are conceptually related to other types of rights, principally moral rights;

Is it impossible to explain the concept of Rights?

White (1984), for example, argued that the task is impossible because the concept of a right is as basic as any of the others, such as duty, liberty, power, etc (or any set of them) into which it is usually analysed. He agreed, however, that rights can in part be explained by reference to such concepts.