Good preparation for the exam is a guarantee of success. What to do when preparation is lacking, and the deadline has arrived inexorably? The chances of passing depend on very peculiar and distinctive skills. Read this text from the case study writing service r to see what ploys and ways you can use to try your luck in a session skirmish with the examiner.

 

Playing for credit

First, you need to grasp and understand the context of the whole situation. After all, when you enter the exam, you begin a GAME, which is not much different from a console RPG, a card game, or a skirmish on a chessboard. As a seasoned player, you must set yourself a specific goal: to win. In this case, it’s about avoiding a fix.

 

You won’t be playing for a high score, because it’s a game with obstacles, a lot of risks, and requires considerable skill. It is better to have a small stake in front of your eyes than to increase the risk in a hopeless situation. It is very easy to overshoot the subject and consequently come out as a lunatic.

 

There are two players: you and the examiner. To start playing meaningfully you need to use your strengths, such as intelligence, brilliance, good memory, an instant association of facts, and persistence, so you need to fight stress. Most likely you will not pass… the only thing that can save you from this situation is a relaxed and brilliant mind. In order for it to act freely you must master your nerves and let it work.

 

Get to know your opponent

Now it’s time to consider what goals your opponent, the examiner, has. Here the situation is no longer so clear and obvious. Let’s look at his motivations, I will show you five possible goals of the examiner:

 

• To fail as little as possible, so that you do not have to bother with corrections
• Survive the exam and go for a beer as soon as possible
• To check and evaluate knowledge fairly and honestly
• Use the last chance to still teach the students something
• Knockdown, scold and infuriate the student, or inspire admiration for one’s own person

Remember that the examiner may be unaware of the goal he is setting for himself. Of course, he may also adopt several goals. The relationship is simple. The more complex the examiner’s motivation, the easier it is to lead him astray.

 

How to recognize which motivation is closest to your examinator? Consider the amount of time he or she spends with one person, the friendly or hostile attitude, the preparation of the exam (questions printed or off the top of your head?), recall the style and impressions of the class and pay attention to what grades the best students receive.

 

It is worth noting that often classes are an excuse to create a falsified image of the exam. It’s not uncommon for teachers to tell you about the dreaded pass in order to make your study through intimidation, and then they no longer feel like verifying the student’s timid knowledge.

 

Gather your tools, develop a strategy and build an arsenal

It’s time to get down to specifics, which means building an arsenal that you can use in the exam-passing game. It’s best to try to reduce the question-answer rule to a looser, less formalized form. The ideal would be a conversation.

 

The old martial arts suggest a brilliant strategy – use your opponent’s strength against him. How to do it? When you see the examiner asking you about your successes, of which you have no idea, start talking about the teaching successes you have observed in your classes. When the examiner asks incomprehensible questions, answer in a similar way, use terms from the question and mix things up as much as you can, this is a risky strategy, but sometimes it works even in reputable scientific journals. Let’s see what tools you can use to increase the likelihood of getting a passing grade:

 

To fail as little as possible, so that you don’t have to bother with corrections

Here the only task of the student is not to bother the belfry. You can count on the exam to “pass itself”. However, if you need to say something, I suggest using the following tips:

• Wring out as many words as possible, move from topic to topic smoothly, and with a swagger talk brazenly about things you know nothing about.
• Avoid specifics like fire. When you speak generalities, emphasize that it is objective and certain knowledge. It is useful to talk about the relevance of a phenomenon instead of its essence.
• Necessarily emphasize the multitude of literature, it is good even at the last minute to learn several authors and titles of books. Finally, to a specific question, answer that different sources state differently.
• The final, desperate and risky strategy is to get the examiner out of balance so that it no longer wants to see you on the amendment.

 

Survive the exam and go for a beer as soon as possible

Professional burnout doesn’t only affect kindergarten teachers. University teachers, too, are sometimes heartily fed up with their work, especially if they have a paycheck amount in mind. In this case, too, you must not be disturbed, and you must behave in such a way as to survive the minute eye-to-eye meeting with the teacher.

 

Remember that the teacher wants to leave the university as soon as possible. In order to believe in your preparation, scraps of concrete knowledge are enough for him. Sometimes the examinator will ask a question like “What part of the material aroused particular interest?” or “Which part do you know best?”. It takes at least one topic that we can talk about for a while giving the impression of being specific. When you are absolutely sure that the examiner is not listening to you, you can talk for a long while as much as possible, and then summarize the statement in the style “All these arguments prove that…” or “All these factors make up the essence….”.

 

 

Check and reliably, fairly assess knowledge

This case is super heavyweight. It is almost impossible to come out of the fight uninjured. Most likely, you will not pass. Consider gaining your opponent’s recognition and admitting ignorance. You can outright say that you failed to prepare and, out of respect for the examiner’s time, do not want to usurp the right to prove that you know nothing. However, if you are desperate and want to fight despite everything, try to arrange a strategy from the following tips:
Use the opposition between theory and practice. A committed scientist is eager to find out what practice looks like known to his students.

 

• Use frequent references to famous writers, Nobel laureates, or cultural figures. Make up quotes and attribute them to little-known people. Never attribute famous quotes to well-known authors if you are not sure.

 

• Bring the answer to a question to a resolution that is more specific or more general than the meaning of the question. For example, when a question is asked about a rectangle, you talk about geometric figures or a square.

 

• When the examiner puts you up against the wall and demands specifics, you don’t see any salvation for yourself appeal to exam stress and start telling that you’re sure it’s in the textbook, after all, you learned it by heart yesterday.

 

If you only know part of the answer to the question, and the question is about inference, mix up everything you can and present it as vaguely as possible. Chances are that the hint will put you on the right track.

 

Use the last chance to still teach the students something

If you are sure that the examiner’s goal has been correctly guessed, the matter is saved. The only question that remains is how long you will have to endure the embarrassment and humble yourself to announce that a positive result will motivate you to read on your own.

 

Here are tips: Since you don’t have the means to act on reason, act on the examiner’s will. Assure him or her that the exam is in an important field, and also that after passing you will reach for all the textbooks to consolidate your knowledge and skills.

 

This type of exam is a unique opportunity to ask the belfry a question. After all, you can point out that some issues, despite the great cognitive effort, remained incomprehensible to you. You will gain time, show your insight and divert attention from your ignorance.

 

To oppress, scold and infuriate the student, or to inspire admiration for your own person

In this case, you must do everything you can to prevent the examiner from proving his power to you by entering a failing grade in your index. Divert attention from the exam situation itself and create an opportunity for him to talk about his successes and adorn himself with the majesty of his own glory. No one harms witnessing his success. Unfortunately, this is the path in which you will most often have to renounce your own dignity: Talk about how poor your work and textbooks are other than those recommended by your tutor. Recall from the class which scholar is his enemy and provoke a conversation about the incompetence of a rival professor. Using the examiner’s favorite terms and words, using his words and his conceptual apparatus is like a laurel to his vanity. Use labeling, properly used oppositions: conservative – progressive, relevant – irrelevant, scientific – gibberish, and others are invaluable tools in the fight for the examiner’s well-being. Ensure that you read publications, and follow the scientific and journalistic activities of your teacher. You can ask for a dedication on a copy of his book.

 

I wish you good luck, in passing your exams and getting out of seemingly hopeless situations. If you have any of your own ways to pass difficult exams, be sure to let me know in the comments!