Trending

How long does a judge have to delay a decision?

How long does a judge have to delay a decision?

Back to the drawing board: in the United States Code, Title 28, §476 (a) (3) is a novel process of making public the names of judges who have taken too long to render judgment. However, it only applies to delays of three years or more! This is not a typo: three (3) years!

How long do you Wait after BVA hearing for a decision?

Then they will send your C-file back to your regional office (or sometimes the AMC if there are other issues pending) to implement that decision. It could take a number of weeks to months before the decision is promilugated.

What happens when a judge takes a case under advisement?

When a judge takes a case under advisement, a controversial matter – a live dispute between real people – remains undecided and in a no-man’s land. “Time is memory’s thief.

What happens when a judge reserves his or her decision?

When a judge reserves his or her decision, that means that they can take it onto their sailboat, on their judicial Pro-D days and contemplate the facts and the law, justice and how to express it crystallize in their judicial minds.

How long does it take for a judge to issue a decision?

If your lawyer is familiar with the judge, he or she may have an idea of how long that judge is known to take to issue a decision. The average is eight weeks. You can also call your hearing office to ask about the status of your particular case.

Then they will send your C-file back to your regional office (or sometimes the AMC if there are other issues pending) to implement that decision. It could take a number of weeks to months before the decision is promilugated.

How long does it take to get a decision after a disability case?

It can take anywhere from two weeks to three months or more. If your lawyer is familiar with the judge, he or she may have an idea of how long that judge is known to take to issue a decision. The average is eight weeks. You can also call your hearing office to ask about the status of your particular case.

What happens after a hearing with an administrative law judge?

Once you have had a hearing with an Administrative Law Judge, you need to wait for a decision. In some case the judge will announce his/her decision at the hearing. However, most with most cases, the judge will need to review what has been said at the hearing and come to a decision.

How long does it take to get a decision after the ALJ?

Unfortunately, there is no set time.   Sometimes (rarely) an ALJ will announce a favorable decision at the hearing.   Usually, however, it takes 2-3 months to get a decision.   Sometimes it can take six months or longer.

Why are judges delayed in rendering their reasons for judgment?

Delay in rendering reasons for judgment is the #1 disease afflicting judges. In his 1980 book, A Book For Judges, Justice John Owen Wilson noted: “The complaints most frequently made in respect of the conduct of judges relate to delay in the delivery of judgments.

When does a judge refuse to release a decision?

Judges resist this and step behind the shield of independence of the judiciary when the community asks for some kind of mechanism to deflect the very legitimate criticism of the months and months that too often occurs between the end of the hearing and the release of the ultimate decision.

Back to the drawing board: in the United States Code, Title 28, §476 (a) (3) is a novel process of making public the names of judges who have taken too long to render judgment. However, it only applies to delays of three years or more! This is not a typo: three (3) years!

Delay in rendering reasons for judgment is the #1 disease afflicting judges. In his 1980 book, A Book For Judges, Justice John Owen Wilson noted: “The complaints most frequently made in respect of the conduct of judges relate to delay in the delivery of judgments.

How long was Justice Greenfield’s delay in judgment?

But real, effective disciplinary action on a plodding judge is very, very, very rare. In Re Greenfield, the records of Justice Edward Greenfield of the New York Supreme Court (Manhattan) showed outstanding delays of judgment of 4, 7 and even 9 (nine) years in different cases.

Judges resist this and step behind the shield of independence of the judiciary when the community asks for some kind of mechanism to deflect the very legitimate criticism of the months and months that too often occurs between the end of the hearing and the release of the ultimate decision.